| Imported post
Not wishinsg to stir things up , but... this DIR thing,interesting though it may be, seems very rigid to me.
For instance, it suggests that anything but a Halcyon BC is unreliable, whereas I was influenced by my experiences with NOAA to get the OMS system.
I wouldn't mind learning more about DIR and perhaps adopting the bits that really appealed, but the apparent lack of flexibility is (for the likes of me) off-putting.
Is it really as inflexible as I seem to think? I'm afraid that I can't accept the there is only one 'correct' way to configure your kit anymore than I can accept that is is "wrong" to write left-handed.
Regards
Steve |