View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 24-03-04, 10:52 AM
msssltd msssltd is offline
New Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
msssltd saw the sea in a book once
Imported post

Unless it has changed drastically;

IANTD - 50% may be used only as a safety gas during decompression (no acceleration).  If you think that Basic Nx is intended to make your no stop diving safer then Advanced  makes your deco diving safer.  I am not aware of any restrictions in stop times - if the dives on the table you can do it.

The equipment you need for the IANTD Advanced course is a single cylinder and a 'pony' for use as a stage.  Redundancy is talked about extensively but your not required  to be redundant.  In fact when I did my course I had to strip my twins apart and go back to a single.

If you don't go any further, Advanced would allow you to make deco dives, using 50% to mitigate the increased DCI risks.  If you intend to go further, it provides a grounding in technical dive planning, stage handling and gas switching.  When your comfortable with the new skills, you go back for Technical Nitrox or Normoxic Trimix; both of which require fully redundant setups (twinsets) and include lots of practical lessons using them.

As far as the differences in TDI and IANTD go.  I put it down to the agency directors.  Tom Mount (IANTD) is a bit of a hippy and idealest - hence IANTD courses are very detailed but with little attention pad to presentation.  Bret Gilliam (TDI) is more of a business man - hence you get better presented materials and a set of limits which encourage TDI gaining market share.

Whichever course, your instructor is more important than the course itself.  I have always gone for instructors that are actively using the techniques they are teaching.  The more demanding the better.

YMMV
Matt
Reply With Quote