Quote:
| Originally Posted by GLOC What I was trying to say was the ratio deco which most people subscribe to is based around a standard set of gases, standard rates of ascent and standard deco deco gases.
Yes, you can create ratio deco tables for whatever mix and depth you like but I very much doubt that someone who is doing AN & DP will be at that skillset. Indeed the published RD profiles are based on Trimix so it would be out of the scope of this discussion.
However, I cannot see how your 1:1 profile can be more conservative than my 1:1 profile unless you are using a higher ppO2 because 30mins on the bottom equals 30mins of deco.
Can you also tell me the difference between RD and DOTF as I thought they were the same?  |
Not much, just DOTF is generaly accepted as being the GUE version using the GUE standard gas list. Ratio deco can be calculated on pret much any gas list
My 1:1 profile will be based on max depth and run time will be from leaving the surface to starting my ascent.
I beleive yours is average depth starting your time from the bottom of the shot.
QED I will be doing more deco than you dispite leaving the bottom at the same time.
But i am old and fat and you are young (ger) and fit
ATB
Mark
Quote:
|
Computers wise, I only know of names but don't know capabilities as I just use bottom timers therefore I was just suggesting a variety of options.
|
Thats what i thaught.
From what I have seen the only cheep alternative two gas computer to the VR3 is the VR2.
If there is a cheeper better computer id like to know what it is.
Unless the Vytec DS and the Marres have started giving out proper TTS info they are still crap.
ATB
Mark