View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 14-07-04, 12:39 PM
dave archer's Avatar
dave archer dave archer is offline
Lucky Man
 

Join Date: May 2003
Location: North London
Posts: 2,031
dave archer is a scuba diver - cold waterdave archer is a scuba diver - cold waterdave archer is a scuba diver - cold waterdave archer is a scuba diver - cold waterdave archer is a scuba diver - cold waterdave archer is a scuba diver - cold waterdave archer is a scuba diver - cold waterdave archer is a scuba diver - cold waterdave archer is a scuba diver - cold waterdave archer is a scuba diver - cold waterdave archer is a scuba diver - cold water
Question

This is something I've wondered about too and not got round to asking before.

So Gradient Factors are purely determined by depth/time relative to previous depth/time? Or do they take deco/bottom gas mixes into account in some way?

On a (possibly) related note. When switching to a low nitrogen gas to off gas, you're creating a difference (gradient?) between the nitrogen in your tissues and the nitrogen in the gas in your lungs, which helps the nitrogen come out of your tissues quicker. Is it theoretically possible to make this difference too big, and end up bending yourself by encouraging the nitrogen out too quick? E.g. if oxygen wasn't toxic at depth, if you switched straight to 100% oxtgen then the gradient of tissue/lung nitrogen would be infinite and presumably you'd fizz like a very fizzy thing?

I ask because a lot of threads give the impression that using the lowest nitrogen % possible is the best way to off gas.

I'm (obviously!) not deco trained at the moment, but considering it as a next step.

Thanks,
Dave.
__________________
Experience is a dear teacher, and only fools will learn from no other. -- Benjamin Franklin
Fish Online (eat sustainable fish) Shark Trust Marine Conservation UK My photos
http://www.yorkshire-divers.com <- Carlsberg don't make diver forums...
Reply With Quote