View Single Post
  #209 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-08, 01:45 PM
Garf's Avatar
Garf Garf is online now
Chimp 2
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 6,157
Garf was born with gillsGarf was born with gillsGarf was born with gillsGarf was born with gillsGarf was born with gillsGarf was born with gillsGarf was born with gillsGarf was born with gillsGarf was born with gillsGarf was born with gillsGarf was born with gills
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonP
Well you will still be a bit narked at 30m on nitrox. That's part of your standard gases, right?

Shutting down the valves won't cause stress. Your first stage exploding in a mass of bubbles bringing down all sort of crap from the ceiling and reducing the viz is going to stress anyone.

So I personally prefer instinctive. I'm going to think a lot straighter when I know that half my gas is safe.

Jason



I get what your saying, I really do, but you're trying to compare a mechanism for self sufficiency, with a mechamism for team sufficiency. It's no wonder DIR looks a bit crap.

However, I could equally argue that I take a spare twinset as redundancy on every dive, and each third of that gas is self contained in the event of failure, no matter which valve I shut down. If you really work at the team thing, then all of a sudden a lot of the DIR approach starts to stand up against individual approaches.

we don't wave a torch "hopefully". We signal them. They take over. they are a CRITICAL part of the drill / emergency. again, your thinking is "individual". DIr is never going to stand up to scrutiny with an individual mindset. Just as the idea of "hopefully" signalling someone is baffling to a DIR diver.
__________________
Garf
Postatem obscuri lateris nescitis.
www.teamfoxturd.com

Last edited by Garf : 02-05-08 at 01:48 PM.