View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 13-05-08, 09:21 AM
Cussy's Avatar
Cussy Cussy is online now
The only stupid question is the one you don't ask!!
 

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Keyworth, Notts.
Posts: 657
Cussy is a scuba diver - warm waterCussy is a scuba diver - warm waterCussy is a scuba diver - warm waterCussy is a scuba diver - warm waterCussy is a scuba diver - warm waterCussy is a scuba diver - warm waterCussy is a scuba diver - warm waterCussy is a scuba diver - warm waterCussy is a scuba diver - warm waterCussy is a scuba diver - warm waterCussy is a scuba diver - warm water
David - Thanks for sharing those. I notice the second was taken at a 1/400th, so a slower shutter speed and higher f number might have helped (although you then might get blurring), but on the first image you don't have so much latitude. What does "lightly optimised" mean? Sharpening of images can often make the noise appear worse. What I tend to do is remove the noise first then sharpen. If the red spectrum was seriously lacking, which in natural light photography it always will be less than say 5m, then a readjustment of red will result in a lot of noise. Manual WB is just doing this for you, so the noise is most likely coming from the incomplete light spectrum. Natural light is definitely a time when capture in RAW is an advantage. You better hope those clever Russian's do a Fuji hack, just like those pesky Canon owners have

There are plenty of programmes that can deal with this sort of noise, Noise Ninja for instance. Your images just go to show we are at the absolute limits of what these remarkable little cameras can do. They aren't designed for underwater.
Rob
__________________
East Midlands Underwater Photographers www.emup.org.uk
www.robcuss.co.uk

Camera kit: Nikon D80 in Ikelite housing, Tokina 10-17mm, Sigma 50mm, Sigma 105mm, twin Ikelite DS-125 strobes
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote