240m dive report

[Dan Wilko]

also was it a standard unit or it could have been modified to cope with the increased depth.

[PW1664]

Originally Posted by ccr_ada

I have been thinking about a new unit and doing deep diving, we all know the inspo has a depth limit and I saw this a factory meg down at 240m thats what im interested in!!

Then I find out it never and still cant see who is telling porkys and I would like to know the max depth for a meg! As I cant get on RBW (Tho' none can tell me why) The post Cedric has put has been contradicted by his fellow divers so I was giving the rest of the community a chance to see Bens side as well as he has not posted on here!

PS .
Its not my site! But yes I am a mod on there!

You're having a laugh

What's your real motive?

[Morg_NZ]

This I think is his motive

Cause he's a numpty and spends more time on the net than actually diving????


Or perhaps because he's just after baiting people??

I agree with Mal........ end the thread and stop the bitching.

By the way!!! if you've done some deep dives on OC like you claim to have done earlier CCR_ADA why are you not awaire of the depth limit of the Meg??? it's well documented

Here's a hint...... try Google.

[Skeletor]

By the way!!! if you've done some deep dives on OC like you claim to have done earlier CCR_ADA why are you not awaire of the depth limit of the Meg??? it's well documented

Here's a hint...... try Google.

The published depth limit of a rebreather, and what depth it has actually ever been dived to are two completely seperate things. The inspo for example has (with modifications) been taken to 272m, whereas it has only been test by the manufacturer to 160m.

Searching google for max depth on a meg throws up a dodgy report claiming 240m. I believ CCR_ADA is actually trying to find out what the real lemit is for a meg, not the manufacturers tested limit, or a ficticious limit dreampt up by a weel known cave diver.

Cause he's a numpty and spends more time on the net than actually diving????

You might want to drag your head out your ass before you start random speculation.

[Morg_NZ]

Originally Posted by Skeletor

The published depth limit of a rebreather, and what depth it has actually ever been dived to are two completely seperate things. The inspo for example has (with modifications) been taken to 272m, whereas it has only been test by the manufacturer to 160m.

Searching google for max depth on a meg throws up a dodgy report claiming 240m. I believ CCR_ADA is actually trying to find out what the real lemit is for a meg, not the manufacturers tested limit, or a ficticious limit dreampt up by a weel known cave diver.



You might want to drag your head out your ass before you start random speculation.

Get a life.
The guys a twat....If you wanna support CCR_ADA then do so on fact not opinion.

It's called flaming and the guys{and you} are attempting to provoke a neg reply

[Skeletor]

The guys a twat....If you wanna support CCR_ADA then do so on fact not opinion.

I do believe its the facts that ada's interested in. Where are your facts for your presumptions on his motives ? Do you actually know him ?

It's called flaming and the guys{and you} are attempting to provoke a neg reply

No, I just get pissed at arseholes implying one person is an armchair diver, when they themselves appear to have spent a considerable amount of time posting shite on the net.

Remember this . . . .

Cause he's a numpty and spends more time on the net than actually diving????

[jon wright]

The question still remains to be answered, why publish thet a Meg had gone to 240 when it didn't? This is dangerous mis-information.

[Skeletor]

The question still remains to be answered, why publish thet a Meg had gone to 240 when it didn't? This is dangerous mis-information.

Not entirely sure that we will ever find out. The more reports that come out, the more contradiction there seems to be.

Its a shame, it was divers like these that I had a lot of repect for and have read their reports and websites for a few years, but this whole thing has cast doubt on the credibility of any of them. I know they will continue to do some serious dives, but there will always be a nagging doubt. Its like finding out santas not real

[GLOC]

I have had more than a couple of reported posts on this thread. Please behave and stop the name calling or the thread will be closed.

[Morg_NZ]

Originally Posted by GLOC

I have had more than a couple of reported posts on this thread. Please behave and stop the name calling or the thread will be closed.

Good idea!