| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the YD Scuba forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
| Decompression Diving: Discuss PADI vs BSAC in the Technical and Specialist Diving Forums forums: And note the forum Arising out of Gledders thread, I thought I'd compare the PADI RDP to BSAC 88s. I ... |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| PADI vs BSAC And note the forum Arising out of Gledders thread, I thought I'd compare the PADI RDP to BSAC 88s. I know that 88s have a reputation for being aggressive, and to be fair, I dive a lot more conservatively than either of the PADI or BSAC tables. However I thought that a side-by-side comparison of no-stop times might be useful. I've assumed a 15m/min ascent rate for BSAC tables. Obviously this is quite high, and if you have a slower ascent rate then the no-stop times (for the BSAC tables) are reduced. .. . Padi BSAC 20m 44 - 21m - 36 22m 36 - 24m - 28 25m 28 - 27m - 22 30m 19 18 33m - 15 35m 13 - 36m - 12 39m - 10 40m 8 - 42m 7 9 So pretty much the same. Although PADI are every so slightly more agressive above 30m and BSAC are a bit more aggressive below. Janos
__________________ You can lead a horse to water but you can't climb a ladder with a large bell in both hands - Vic Reeves DO of Hellfins Last edited by Janos : 04-09-05 at 10:35 PM. |
| ||||
| Janos - you and I have discussed this off the boards and I'm sorry that the other thread appeared to turn into a bash the BSAC 88 tables debate. I had to learn how to use the PADI wheel last week (don't ask) and was stunned at how aggressive it appeared to be. I personally don't want to follow such profiles but it has to be said that loads of divers have followed both of these tables and survived hundreds of 1,000s of dives. TBH it's the ascent rate which frightens me the most. Mind you, Al Frase and I faff so much that we are lucky to get going at all sometimes
__________________ Interested in DIR dive training/courses? - always happy to chat/answer questions via PM or email |
| ||||
| Quote:
Janos (who's hugely in favour of 6m/min ascent rates.)
__________________ You can lead a horse to water but you can't climb a ladder with a large bell in both hands - Vic Reeves DO of Hellfins |
| ||||
| Quote:
Dom
__________________ Dom I reject your reality and substitute my own -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters DIR-RA |
| ||||
| Quote:
Does this make the wheel aggressive? No, it just makes it as aggressive as a dive computer. Its just a case of keeping things in perspective and remembering what no-stop diving is all about.
__________________ FathomsDown - Where diving trips happen |
| ||||
| Hi I can't resist a debate comparing PADI and BSAC without wanting to put the SSI oar into the debate. Firstly a bit about the PADI tables....which were created as a consequence of a 3 year study and have remained unchanged since then AFAIK. It produced a table which was very suited to the American deep/quick, followed by a shallow/longer style of diving using a "faster" controlling compartment of 60 mins so that in most cases the repetitive dive is done going in as an A diver. The PADI tables do have a number of caveats though....under certain circumstances, the recommended safety stop becomes compulsory and if certain limits are reached then a min surface interval comes into play. If diving in cold conditions then the recommendation is to dive as though the depth is 4m deeper than you actually dive.....which makes them look less agressive. SSI tables are as follows: 7.5m 245mins 9.0m 205mins 10.5m 160mins 12.0m 130mins 15.0m 70mins 18.0m 50mins 21.0m 40mins 24.0m 30mins 27.0m 25mins 30.0m 20mins 33.0m 15mins 36.0m 10mins 39.0m 5mins These are based on the US Navy Tables with the Doppler limits applied and have a 9m/min ascent rate and optional safety stop regardless of proximity to the table limits....of course it's recommended but never mandatory. Best Regards Mal |
| ||||
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Janos
__________________ You can lead a horse to water but you can't climb a ladder with a large bell in both hands - Vic Reeves DO of Hellfins |
| ||||
| oi! agency bashing and I missed it! The 9m/min ascent rate is viewed by padi as the fastest safe ascent rate, (equal to Alun's mate's rate of exhalation bubbles. The bubbles are the guide should all other equipment fail.) In other words, not any faster than this, but slower is better. And good to know that some people (janos e.g.) dive more conservatively than the limits given. Why push it? my $0.02 moray
__________________ ...because Babylon is nothing but an infinite game of chance. (J.L. Borges) The mother of chaos was born in a sea. (Frank Herbert) soppy cow (Diving Dude) www.scuba-diving-tenerife.com |
| ||||
| The "No faster then your smallest bubbles" is the fast limit and another useful guide (after all there are some divers out there NOT using computers SHOCK, HORROR Its something that is easy to note in an emergency or panicky moment. I use it as a guide during AAS and CBL lifts - works for me Edit- In fact yesterday it was the first indicator i noticed that my buddy was dragging me up a bit quick. He was behind me on a released shot line and went up a bit rapid, past me holding the shot line.
__________________ Paul Oliver Canterbury Divers DUE - Dover Underwater Explorers 2 Rules - 1. You books you pays. 2. Always return to the shot Last edited by Paul Oliver : 05-09-05 at 09:49 AM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||