Yorkshire Divers

Dive Life Dive Shop - Manchester
Go Back   YD Scuba Diving Forums > Technical and Specialist Diving Forums > DIR
User Name
Password

Welcome to the YD Scuba forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

DIR: Discuss Tech1 Ratio Deco - Explained in the Technical and Specialist Diving Forums forums: If you are on 32% (which GUE advocate) then the limit for 30m is 30mins and you can use plus ...

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-07, 05:34 PM
Mark Chase's Avatar
Mark Chase Mark Chase is offline
A short fat well off crap cave diver. Likes wrecks
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 9,903
Mark Chase is never out of the waterMark Chase is never out of the waterMark Chase is never out of the waterMark Chase is never out of the waterMark Chase is never out of the waterMark Chase is never out of the waterMark Chase is never out of the waterMark Chase is never out of the waterMark Chase is never out of the waterMark Chase is never out of the waterMark Chase is never out of the water
Quote:
Originally Posted by GLOC
If you are on 32% (which GUE advocate) then the limit for 30m is 30mins and you can use plus or minus 5mins for 3m to about 21m and then it starts breaking down.

A rough and ready table is available here.

I am sure there is another one available from GUE which I will try and source now.




ATB

Mark Chase
__________________
Mark, dispite the fact your a Heron shagging tosser I agree with you , Steve S 10/04/08
ATB as most people will tell you, means Always Talking Boll@cks. My responses to threads should be treated accordingly
All The Best

Mark Chase


Screw the force Luke, use the VR3
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-07, 06:18 PM
Mal Bridgeman's Avatar
Mal Bridgeman Mal Bridgeman is offline
A Moderate Chimp
Recent Blog: One-Nil to me
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 6,798
Mal Bridgeman was born with gillsMal Bridgeman was born with gillsMal Bridgeman was born with gillsMal Bridgeman was born with gillsMal Bridgeman was born with gillsMal Bridgeman was born with gillsMal Bridgeman was born with gillsMal Bridgeman was born with gillsMal Bridgeman was born with gillsMal Bridgeman was born with gillsMal Bridgeman was born with gills
Mark

The Ascent times on the 32% table looks different to what I was taught on my Fundies class.

We were taught 9m/min to half the average depth rounded to the next deepest depth cleanly divisible by 3 then 3m/min thereafter.

So from 21m Ascend to 12m at 9m/min so 1 min expired, 1 min to get to 9, 1 to 6 1 to 3 then 1 to the surface giving a total of 5 mins.

Is that what others who did the course recently do?

Mal
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-07, 08:04 PM
neilh's Avatar
neilh neilh is offline
Haemoglobin on the bus...
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Barnsley
Posts: 2,336
neilh is never out of the waterneilh is never out of the waterneilh is never out of the waterneilh is never out of the waterneilh is never out of the waterneilh is never out of the waterneilh is never out of the waterneilh is never out of the waterneilh is never out of the waterneilh is never out of the waterneilh is never out of the water
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mal Bridgeman
We were taught 9m/min to half the average depth rounded to the next deepest depth cleanly divisible by 3 then 3m/min thereafter.

...

Is that what others who did the course recently do?
I actually go a bit more conservative:
9M/min to 50% depth, then
3M/min to 6M and 3 min stop @6 (clears computers and gives a bit of a break), then
1M/min to surface

Not everyone I dive with is using a gauge/timer hence the 3min stop.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-07, 10:16 PM
Garf's Avatar
Garf Garf is online now
Chimp 2
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 5,882
Garf is never out of the waterGarf is never out of the waterGarf is never out of the waterGarf is never out of the waterGarf is never out of the waterGarf is never out of the waterGarf is never out of the waterGarf is never out of the waterGarf is never out of the waterGarf is never out of the waterGarf is never out of the water
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mal Bridgeman
Mark

The Ascent times on the 32% table looks different to what I was taught on my Fundies class.

We were taught 9m/min to half the average depth rounded to the next deepest depth cleanly divisible by 3 then 3m/min thereafter.

So from 21m Ascend to 12m at 9m/min so 1 min expired, 1 min to get to 9, 1 to 6 1 to 3 then 1 to the surface giving a total of 5 mins.

Is that what others who did the course recently do?

Mal
That's what I was taught, but not what I do. I would slow the final portion of the ascent to 1M per minute from 6 metres, simply becuase this is what we do on every dive, regardless of what type of dive it is.
__________________
Garf
Postatem obscuri lateris nescitis.
www.teamfoxturd.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 29-12-07, 09:37 AM
Kev's Avatar
Kev Kev is offline
Skiver
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London
Posts: 153
Kev swims in cold waterKev swims in cold waterKev swims in cold waterKev swims in cold waterKev swims in cold waterKev swims in cold waterKev swims in cold waterKev swims in cold waterKev swims in cold waterKev swims in cold waterKev swims in cold water
Thanks to Mal for pointing me at this thread. It is really very interesting.

I understand that this method seeks to control the gas mixes so that in a given range of exposures to depth and time the ratio calculations will work by approximating what your deco obligations will be.

I have two questions:

1. What underlying decompression model is this based on?

2. What are the results of using this method in practice and / or testing i.e. has it been used or tested widely without lots of people bending themselves silly?

Just for the sake of clarity I am not planning on doing any diving with mandatory stops anytime soon, I am just interested in the theory.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.yorkshire-divers.com/forums/dir/53187-tech1-ratio-deco-explained.html
Posted By For Type Date
Boness Sub Aqua - Dive planning - 2 April 2007 This thread Refback 04-04-07 12:46 PM
Boness Sub Aqua - Search Results This thread Refback 04-04-07 07:10 AM


Sponsored Links

Yorkshire Divers - RSS Feed
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:24 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Trademark and all rights reserved : © YD.com Ltd (2006)
YD.com Ltd (Registered in England - 05886696)
Other sites : Golf Clubs | New Premiership Football Kits | MP3 Portable Players | MP3 Players For Sale | Replica Football Kits

Forums Directory