Quote:
| Originally Posted by Daz217 ummm not convinced why complicate matters. |
Er, I'm not really trying to convince you of anything... I just put forward my interpretation of Nigel's comments.
I might, in any case, be wrong. It happened once, but I think I got away with it !
Quote:
| Originally Posted by Daz217 One source of buoyancy one issue to deal with? use the other as redundancy or in the case of the BCD for surface buoyancy. If you are correctly weighted why would you want an additional source of buoyancy? unless it packed up and then you would go to the other.
Just my 2p worth |
My original point here was that if you ARE just using one source of buoyancy then it's important not to overlook the fact that you have an additional (unused by default) source that can cause you a problem.
I THINK the suggestion of using both, one for warmth, one for buoyancy, means you're using both as a matter of course and are less likely to make this mistake.
Quote:
| Originally Posted by Daz217 Each to their own though  more than one way to skin a cat. |
I 'ates cats. Cat skinning apparatuses at the ready!!

(and now donning tin hat & wellies!!).