| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the YD Scuba forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
| Instructor's Area: Discuss HSE regulations for dive training in the Training Area forums: Since PADI calls confined water training 'dives', the HSE contends that they should be treated as a dive with all ... |
| View Poll Results: Do you meet HSE requirements when training? | |||
| I'm sure that I meet all HSE requirements when training | | 10 | 50.00% |
| I'm not sure I meet all HSE requirements when training | | 3 | 15.00% |
| I don't meet all HSE requirements when training | | 3 | 15.00% |
| What's the HSE? | | 4 | 20.00% |
| Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Quote:
The issue here is not that PADI calls confined water training "dives" but the fact that the Diving at Work Regulations 1997 applies to commercial divers working in both open water and confined water (pools & tanks are known as "benign environments" in the regs & ACoP). It's not a project being classed as a dive that makes it subject to the DWR97 and relevant ACoP, but rather that a commercial project involves breathing compressed gas underwater. All instructors training divers in an at work situation, regardless of agency, irrespective of whatever that agency calls training in a swimming pool, whether confined or open water, are subject to the DWR97 and ACoP. The requirements for a benign environment differ to open water in respect to team size. In a benign environment (confined water) any commercial dive that involves a diver breathing compressed gas underwater is required to be part of a team with a minimum of two members. The second member of the team may be at the surface, not in diving equipment provided that s/he is able to provide assistance in the event of an emergency. The diver(s) in a benign environment are still subject to medical, risk assessment, O2 & first aid requirements, etc, as per open water. As you will be aware the minimum team size for an 'at work' project in open water is three, two in the water (one able to provide assistance to the other), one at the surface. Cadburysegg, also see my previous post in another thread www.yorkshire-divers.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=225066#post225066, it might help with the definition of an 'at work' dive and whether you'll have to abide by the ACoP or not. TG
__________________ the greatest risk in life is to risk nothing Last edited by Tank Girl : 17-04-05 at 09:10 PM. Reason: missing 'etc' ! |
| ||||
| I don't log pool dives, we do take O2 and First Aid kit to pool. I don't have surface cover at a pool, sometimes I don't have a 'Rescue diver' either. In Open water, I ensure that we have all of the above, as well as the project plan and dive log, which are kept with the surface cover at all times. None of us have first aid at work AFAIK. So I don't know what to vote. I will have to really go over the HSE regs.
__________________ __________________________________ Sean Arrowsmith ---------------------------------- If in doubt - Give it a clout www.sean-h2o.com - Some more of my pictures |
| ||||
| I guess that's a no then. In confined water you need a safety diver (Rescue or better) and they need to have a proper HSE medical, not just a standard dive medical. Thanks for all the useful responses/links.
__________________ When the mariner has been tossed for many days in thick weather, and on an unknown sea, he naturally avails himself of the first pause in the storm, the earliest glance of the sun, to take his latitude, and ascertain how far the elements have driven him from his true course. Let us imitate this prudence, and, before we float farther on the waves of this debate, refer to the point from which we departed, that we may at least be able to conjecture where we now are. |
| ||||
| Once again, typical HSE horseshit. All of these rules and regs were meant for the commercial dive industry, and by that I mean those who have to have HSE approved courses, eg. oil rig and dock workers etc. What is the point in having a rescue diver in a swimming pool?? Does this mean we also need surface cover at swimming pools?? 2 O2 kits if we have 2 groups. Damn, the shop I work at often has 4 maybe 5 different activities going on in the pool at the same time. Does all this HSE crap mean that every diver in the water needs a rescue diver, surface cover, O2 kit, and first aid kit. Damn, I think we need a bigger van and 4 more O2 sets. F*ckin HSE grumble grumble ![]()
__________________ __________________________________ Sean Arrowsmith ---------------------------------- If in doubt - Give it a clout www.sean-h2o.com - Some more of my pictures |
| ||||
| A commie fishing a dropped tool box out of the bottom of a tank isn't that much different from an instructor in a pool. Why should the regs be any different. Either both are exempt or neither are. I seem to remember that these requirements have been around for a long while. I remember the same thing getting discussed in the PADI journal, and it's been years since I've been teaching.
__________________ "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me" Hunter S Thompson http://www.snp.org Last edited by NotDeadYet : 18-04-05 at 11:55 AM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ __________________________________ Sean Arrowsmith ---------------------------------- If in doubt - Give it a clout www.sean-h2o.com - Some more of my pictures |
| ||||
| Quote:
O2 kits - interesting, but it does make some sort of sense that if one O2 is in use and you still have divers in the water, as part of another project, then you would need an additional unit. Whether you would need one per team in the event of several projects is debateable, however. I would hope that just having redundancy is all that is required. One to run past HSE in London, not just the local inspector, as they do not always sing from the same song sheet. I'll ask and get back to you, however it may not be quick! Ultimately, all DWR97/ACoP requirements should be implemented as it is the law, whether we like it or not. Whether it has a financial implication on the contractor (dive school) is beyond the HSE's interest, they would just argue that prices must be increased to ensure compliance with said law, irrespective of whether an instructor/school considers the application of those 'commercial' diving laws appropriate to diver training. Consider that if all training providers / dive schools complied with all requirements then all 'commercial' recreational diver training would be competing on a level playing field, and students would receive a level of care that they expect and deserve. [that comment is aimed at those instructors/schools who operate at a minimum level of (non?) compliance before I get flamed!]. Also consider our professional instructor friends in Ireland. Their HSA (equivalent to the UK HSE) is proposing in their new Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Diving at Work) Regulations 2005 that the minimum team size is FOUR, a supervisor, a working diver, a standby diver and a tender for the working diver. OMG Now that would really hurt... TG
__________________ the greatest risk in life is to risk nothing |
| ||||
| Quote:
I think that with more than two teams in the water at once, additional O2 and first aiders would probably be sensible given the requirements.
__________________ When the mariner has been tossed for many days in thick weather, and on an unknown sea, he naturally avails himself of the first pause in the storm, the earliest glance of the sun, to take his latitude, and ascertain how far the elements have driven him from his true course. Let us imitate this prudence, and, before we float farther on the waves of this debate, refer to the point from which we departed, that we may at least be able to conjecture where we now are. |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ __________________________________ Sean Arrowsmith ---------------------------------- If in doubt - Give it a clout www.sean-h2o.com - Some more of my pictures |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||