What kind of book worm are you?

[divegyrl]

I will read & read & read! I can get through a book a day when I'm travelling.
It's all mostly Crime & punishment with the odd horror or two thrown in!

So Kellerman (both Faye & Jonathan)
Stephen King lots & Koontz occasionally,
I Like Anne Rice, but she hasn't brought out anything for ages,
Patricia Cornell, but I have read so many of hers that I usually work it out before the end!
Read all the Dan Brown books after reading Da Vinci Code

Have started James Joyce's Ulysses more than once
Always go back to Lord of The Rings

I read Mike Gayle's new novel "His, Hers" on the plane back from Singapore

Both my sisters did English degrees at Uni, & Niamh always tries to get me to read something more high brow!

Blanaid

[Mr T.]

Da Vinci Code bestseller is plagiarism, authors claim
(Filed: 03/10/2004)

Jesus conspiracy novel has earned £140 million, but now two academic writers say that their historical work preceded it by 20 years, reports Elizabeth Day

It is the biggest-selling adult fiction book of all time and has earned its author a reputed £140 million with its plot about a global conspiracy to suppress Christ's marriage.

The Da Vinci Code has sold more than 12 million copies and has been translated into 42 languages. But now two writers are suing its publishers, claiming that it was copied from their bestseller that first appeared more than 20 years ago.

Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh claim that Dan Brown, the 39-year-old former English teacher from New Hampshire, has "lifted the whole architecture" of the research that they carried out for their non-fiction work The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, which they co-wrote with Henry Lincoln.

They claim that the similarities between the two books are such that they have no choice but to sue Random House, whose imprint Doubleday is the publisher of Brown's novel.

Leigh told the Telegraph after issuing the writ: "It's not that Dan Brown has lifted certain ideas because a number of people have done that before. It's rather that he's lifted the whole architecture - the whole jigsaw puzzle - and hung it on to the peg of a fictional thriller."

The Da Vinci Code tells the story of a Harvard professor who stumbles across a conspiracy to suppress Jesus Christ's marriage to Mary Magdalene and his fathering of a royal bloodline.

Baigent and Leigh claim that the novel's premise and chunks of factual research are plagiarised from their original historical hypothesis, which has sold more than two million copies despite being denounced by several Church commentators as "pseudo-history". Baigent said: "Whether our hypothesis is right or wrong is irrelevant. The fact is that this is work that we put together and spent years and years building up."

The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail was based on six years of research and hypotheses that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and founded a royal bloodline protected by a series of esoteric societies including the Knights Templar and the Priory of Sion, one of whose "Grand Master" heads is claimed to have been Leonardo da Vinci.

The authors argue that Brown lifted their all-important list of the Grand Masters, who supposedly guarded the secret documents pertaining to Christ's bloodline, without acknowledgement.

The only mention of their book is when the villain of The Da Vinci Code, an eccentric English historian called Sir Leigh Teabing, lifts a copy off his bookshelf and says: "To my taste, the authors made some dubious leaps of faith in their analysis, but their fundamental premise is sound."

The name Leigh Teabing is an anagram of Leigh and Baigent, the authors point out, while his physical description - he walks with the aid of crutches - is allegedly based on the third author, Henry Lincoln, who walks with a limp.

Lincoln has decided not to be part of the copyright action because of ill health, but is said to support it.

"We are being lumped in with Dan Brown's work of fiction and that degrades the historical implication of our material," Baigent said. "It makes our work far easier to dismiss as a farrago of nonsense.

"Issuing the writ is not something we have done lightly, but we feel that we have no choice."

Paul Sutton, a lawyer from the City firm Orchard, who is representing Baigent and Leigh, was unavailable for comment.

Whatever the outcome of the forthcoming legal action, the ensuing publicity is unlikely to do any harm to the sales of either book.

[Moray]

Originally Posted by Suzanne

Jane Austen's really good - i loved Pride & Prejudice
...she hasn't brought anything out for a while thou....


oh yes, Phillip Pullman - His Dark Materials - v.good - aimed at children but hey, i'm still one (mentally)!

Yup, a pity she stopped writing, just went off the best-seller list I presume :-D

[Ian B]

Just finished the DaVinci Code. A good read.

Put DaVinci Code into Google UK and it came up with a leaflet from a Catholic organisation inthe USA trying to explain faults in the book. Looks like there's going to be lots of controversy over this one, especially now that Ron Howard had bought the film rights and is planning to start filming in 2005.

Anyway, a good story and I'm off now to buy his earlier book Angels and Demons, which I believe is about the Illuminati.

[Andrew H]

The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail is quite a good read, if fairly heavy going. It's probably far more pallatable as the Da Vinci Code, if they are the same thing. The other work by the same authors about the dead sea scrolls is also interesting but hard work.

Andrew

[Mr T.]

Originally Posted by aclivity

"The Ragged Trousered Philaphropists" by Robert Tressell. It's pitched as a socialist tract...

Originally Posted by Brass Monkey

You're right, the book was branded the socialist bible and banned for a long time (way back when). To me though it’s not about socialism it’s about human nature, that never changes and so this book will never be out of date.

Aye, and there's the rub: elements of literature from both schools (Facism and that by 'Fellow Travellers') will always be punted as the Zeitgeist by those seeking to hijack the agenda when faced with issues they deem to be a bugbear - and then seek out a suitable scapegoat upon whom to heap blame for their woes (cf. Mein Kampf).

But wasn't human nature ever thus?

[Diving Daisy]

Part way through the autobiography of Martin Luther King jnr.

A real eye opener :o

[Spike Jackson]

I'll read just about anything. Recent favourites include Das Boot, Dark Materials series by Phillip Pullman (so I'm a kid!). About to start Shackleton's South.

As a white South African the most interesting and eye opening book I've read was "The Bang-bang Club" by Greg Marinovich and Jaoa Silva. Getting the other side of the story on things very carefully censored by the old government was both very interesting and shocking. Nelson Mandela's book is excellent too.

[Mr T.]

Originally Posted by spike jackson

As a white South African the most interesting and eye opening book I've read was "The Bang-bang Club" by Greg Marinovich and Jaoa Silva. Getting the other side of the story on things very carefully censored by the old government was both very interesting and shocking. Nelson Mandela's book is excellent too.

Hey Spike, if you liked 'The Bang Bang Club', you'd enjoy Gillian (Jo's daughter) Slovo's 'Every Secret Thing'.

[Spike Jackson]

Thanks Bren. Will try get it through the local library.