| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the YD Scuba forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
| Rebreather Accessories: Discuss second hand Sofnolime in the Rebreathers - General Information forums: From Martin on the inspiration list, now I no non of our re-breather divers would be cheapscate enought to ... |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| You know anyone doing that is a fool. This should be forced down students throats by instructors, that you don't remix lime. Go kill yerself for a couple of quid!! Madness. Cheers Dave Cooper |
| |||
| for the sake of £8 really not worth it |
| |||
| Quote:
One guy on Diveoz.com.au does it all the time! Nutter. |
| ||||
| Are there realy people quite this stupid? If so Darwin will be getting involved, so the rest of us probably neadn't worry.
__________________ It Only Hurts if You Survive! |
| ||||
| Digger take note.... There is a half cannister "adapter" for the Dolphin I believe, allowing only a half bed to be packed, is this then considered dangerous, or is it the fact of completely RE-packing used material that's the issue? If a half cannister is OK on the Dolphin, would it be possible to remove half the Inspo cannister of used lime, and repack half a cannister of fresh stuff on top? Perhaps for pool practices or shallow lake bimbles? At the end of the day, I'm not a cheapskate, and with a hundred kilos of the stuff in my garage, I don't skimp on a bed if I need one!!
__________________ |
| ||||
| Quote:
Quote:
Caveat - OC diver, I just read the bit above in post 1 of this thread Best wishes Matt Last edited by MATTBIN : 23-12-04 at 08:54 AM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
There has, I believe, been an incident involving emptying a part used scrubber into a sealed plastic bag to 'save' it and then reloading the scrubber with that mix. Since the scrubber is used from the bottom up this distributes used material through the mix and provides channels of used 'lime that do not scrub. Breakthrough, instead of being a predictable is now statistical and "it works for me" turned out to be Russian Roulette. nigelH |
| ||||
| Quote:
The catch is that the system in which the scrubber material exists is potentially dynamic and unpredictable. I would assume that although normally most of one end of the canister was used there would actually be a distribution throughout the cylinder. When a cylinder is 75% through its life, taking a sample of it does not mean that that sample is 75% through its life, it is somewhere beteen 0 and 100%. If it could be 100% used, adding this to fresh lime (say 10% old to 90% new) could not be treated the same as even a 10% used scrubber, cos the distribution would be of a different model to the normal use case. Worst case scenario, it could provide a channel through the scrubber that meant that the air was unchanged, which would in effect mean that the scrubber was inert. Basically it sounds like russian roulette to me. It equivalent to pouring a bag a flour into your lime and hoping it extends the scrubbers life rather than shortening your own. Conor
__________________ “Did I leave the gas on? No! No, I'm a f***in' squirrel!” Mr E Izzard |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Last edited by Padowan : 23-12-04 at 10:05 AM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||