| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the YD Scuba forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
| Speakers' Corner: Discuss What hope is there for the rest of us when the Police can't be arsed? in the Non-Diving Related Forums forums: Each officer that struggles with poor equipment, lack of support, lack of time, manpower etc.... and does the job properly ... |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ ....Dover Coastguard, CNIS Rules....Dover Sea Cadets.... Dover Sea Cadets - Best Drill squad in the District You don’t need to be good at swimming to save lives. OBVIOUSLY YOUR STUPIDITY IS ONLY MATCHED BY YOUR INCOMPETENCE. |
| ||||
| Quote:
I seem to have misinterpreted your post and for that I apologise. For what its worth I don't intend to be the least bit defensive. The original poster highlighted an example of poor service, I accept totally it was poor service and offered to help to do something about it. I am however fiercely proud of my little force who IMHO do a fantastic job with extremely limited resources. As we are so stretched we cant afford to carry passangers (pardon the pun). It is an unfortunate fact that the service as a whole still carries too many wasters and it is far too hard to get rid of them. Now to other issues, are you sitting comfortably? I'm afraid I cant agree with some of what Mark says about senior officers. We can't lay the ills of the service at their door. That is totally unfair. Like PC's Sgts or whatever there are good and poor senior officers in every force. Can anyone doubt that they want to deliver a good service to the public and those under their command? The reality of the situation in my view is that the lunatics have taken over the asylum. The strength of British policing has always been its independence from Government. This independence began to be eroded when Lady Thatcher sent us in as a political force to break the miners strike. The independence has been eroded by succsesive governments ever since. Each Government has politicised the service a little more, but the pace has changed radically over the past 10 years. The reality is that Government now control how each area is policed. Half of police authority posts are now political appointments. This is to ensure that Government policy is implemented in each force regardless of how the Chief Constables want to police their areas. The subject of both training and Safer Neighbourhoods has been raised elsewhere in the thread. Take training, my area of expertise. We as a force favoured a foundation degree model when the old regime of training colleges closed down as it was more cost effective and IMHO gave a better product. What do we get? An imposed 22 unit NVQ qualification that most forces in the country are struggling to deliver because of the amount of time needed to assess and the Bureacracy involved. Incidentally in response to Busters point that training was brought in house for budgetary reasons, your way off the mark. It costs Dorset Police a lot more to train our staff now than it did before. It is however a better product. The fact is the training that was in place was held to be not fit for purpose in just about any respect you could mention. Safer neighbourhoods have been introduced by Governement, forces have no choice. It is not of a case of it would be nice if you did this.... IMHO most senior officers work very hard to deliver what MUST be delivered under very tight constraints. It is every bit as much of a no win situation for them as much as it is for us. Can anyone really think that senior officers sit around all day thinking up ways to make life difficult for the troops? Ahhhhhh, thats better
__________________ It took me 15 long years just to find out that just because I was angry didnt mean I was right! |
| ||||
| [. Can anyone really think that senior officers sit around all day thinking up ways to make life difficult for the troops? Yes |
| ||||
| Quote:
Plonker LOL ![]()
__________________ It took me 15 long years just to find out that just because I was angry didnt mean I was right! |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Interviewer; 'Think of a number between 1 and 10' Me; 'e' YD Fundraising 2007/8 - Amount Raised Royal National Lifeboat Institution UK Transplant Register Exeter BSAC Last edited by Adrian Kelland : 06-09-07 at 10:33 PM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
The grass can often be greener......
__________________ Never miss a good chance to shut up, because generally speaking, you aren't learning much when your mouth is moving. |
| ||||
| Quote:
1 - Neighbourhood policing is working... 2 - it's the way forward.... On the first point - it depends where you are in the country. On the second - it absolutely is the way forward and I am totally convinced of that. The main issue is whether we really want to pay for it. Response policing is about applying sticky plasters. Rush from one call to another etc. You have to have it and it can never be taken away. It will always be a case of just keeping a lid on things unless you actually try and tackle issues by adopting a problem-solving approach. That's where neighbourhood policing comes in. Working with all of our partners, which includes our communitity. Following priorities set by local ward-based Neighbourhood Panels and Youth Panels following consultation with the ward's community at public meetings, etc. The main problem is that to do Neighbourhood policing properly is bloody expensive. It costs a fortune, takes time and is not a quick-fix. Most forces don't have the money, play at it, because (and you are right about the politics) Police Authorities insist on it. All this does is strip response teams of vital assets and the overall service suffers. The MPS is fortunate, they have been given an extra couple of hundred million to fund Safer Neighbourhoods and there has been no reduction in response officers (that doesn't take into account the additional burden of other new statutory responsibilities). Safer Neighbourhoods really is making a difference in London. Despite this, and the phenominal size of the met and our 35,000 police officers, both last night and today, I listened to one Borough's control room staff informing the local Duty Inspector of one unanswered emergency call after another - it was shameful! The fact is that society is chaning but the Government doesn't really want to confirm to the public what the media keeping saying. To deal with the miriad of problems that have now built up in our society will cost a fortune. What will we do???? Most of us, as `coppers', whether we are Constables or Chief Superintendents, etc. (even `senior' officers!!!), will honestly keep trying to do our best and keep pumping the water out. Andy
__________________ Andy "Sex without love is an empty experience, but as empty experiences go, it's one of the best." "To love is to suffer. To avoid suffering, one must not love. But then, one suffers from not loving. Therefore, to love is to suffer; not to love is to suffer; to suffer is to suffer. To be happy is to love. To be happy, then, is to suffer, but suffering makes one unhappy. Therefore, to be happy, one must love or love to suffer or suffer from too much happiness." Last edited by clockworkdog : 08-09-07 at 11:25 PM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
COLLABORATION. We all know that what the Government is doing to policing is wrong. We all know that chasing simplistic targets does not equate to providing a quality service. But we're still doing it, aren't we? And the reason we are doing it is down to weak and inept supervisors. Nobody is standing up and saying, "No - we're not going to do that!" But why should they? Actually sorting out the problems within our communities is hard work. It's not easy. But sanction detections policy is the perfect cop-out! You don't need to solve anything. All you have to do to look competent enough for that next promotion board is to meet (or better still exceed) your detections target. And all you need to do to achieve that is bully your staff into doing the dirty work for you! Easy! Any incompetent idiot can do that and seal their next promotion as a result. And they justify it by saying, "Well, I'm just doing my job delivering what the Home Office asked for", and still manage to sleep at night. That's why we are doing it. The Government set us targets so they can roll out the figures to boost their failing re-election prospects. And we collaborate with their plan because it suits our promotion prospects equally well. Do we care that behind all those lovely statistics all we are doing is persecuting the innocent and failing to deal with the criminals? Well, some of us do - but it seems that blind eye gets turned the minute you get one foot on the promotion ladder. Maybe things are different in your force, but I'm sorry - from where I'm sitting all ethics and morality seems lost to personal ambition from the rank of inspector upwards.
__________________ Get Tank, Wear Tank, Dive! Last edited by Mark Davies : 09-09-07 at 10:48 PM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||