Just curious here what makes it our country? the fact we were born here, perhaps our grandfather played his part in the war?, or the fact that it is ours by our family's birth right?
whatever the reason we pride ourselves on freedom of speech and that anyone regardless or religion and beliefs can voice there opinions without fear of persecution.
however there are a few people that would change that and whilst i don't agree fully with the 42 day law i can understand why it is there and having worked in that field it's difficult to gather evidence and stop attacks if you have them released after a few days. it will hopefully stop more accidents and over zealous reactions from the security services
Graham
If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared.
Niccolo Machiavelli (1469 - 1527)
Graham,
It's the drip, drip, drip erosion that really worries me. I mean you talk about freedom of speech, but where is that when standing at the cenotaph and naming those killed in Iraq and Afghanistan gets you a criminal record! A lot of people don't seem to understand that tyrants and oppressive regimes don't get there in a single bound but by sneaking away freedoms a bit at a time.
David.
I took up diving because I was tired of being told I was shallow!
I would like to see that but if you go down the route of kicking people out where does it stop, someone does not like the Christmas holidays .............kick them out or even they don't have birthdays kick them out it's a slippery slope, the sadist thing is that although we have all these people working toward stopping terrorist attacks i DON'T have the faith or trust in the government
Graham
If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared.
Niccolo Machiavelli (1469 - 1527)
I have had a 9 month long enquiry with the Compliancy Dept. of HMRC. When I went to a meeting with the two officials I was struck by 1) their low intellect 2) their lack of knowledge regarding my business and 3) the sweeping powers they had to make quite arbitary decisions. It occurred to me that this is what it must have been like dealing with the Gestapo.
I regularly contribute to Diver, DYK (Sweden & Denmark), Undercurrent and other diving magazines but my views expressed here are independent.
People are always so nice to me in the real world, I have to come on YD to get some balance!
Yes, the Twat-O-Tron is working well. Today, Have Your Say, Tomorrow THE WOOORRRRRLLLLLD!!!! Mwahahahahaha...
Ah, thankfully some sanity. The "trust" issue is central to the argument. This government has said that we should "trust" them to use anti-terrorism powers "wisely". It will only be used in extreme, "exceptional" circumstances. The thing is:
- It's the government that decides what constitutes "exceptional". Given that they've been saying that we're living in exceptional times without precedent, that we have never been under such a grave threat before (like WW2 and the IRA never happened), it would seem reasonable that there is NO conceivable circumstance that could not be termed exceptional.
- Laws, particularly laws which limit or remove freedoms, should NEVER be based upon trust. Even if you DO trust the government of the day, what's to prevent another government abusing those same powers?
- I've said it before, and it's still true. Laws are like weapons: there's never been one that hasn't been used, and there's never been one that hasn't been abused.
Ian
“Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it”
- Samuel Johnson
It's not even the government that we have to trust. It's the police. They get to decide which areas the anti-terrorism laws apply. And they can choose areas like London.
We now have a country where you can be arrested for walking along a public cycle path, then have your DNA taken, added to a register and never removed. And where 700+ organisations including local councils can check your mobile phone records to follow up bin misuse inquiries. And where you can be convicted and imprisoned for downloading freely available material from the US Dept of Justice website.
And all stored on databases that the civil service can't be trusted not to send thru the post, unencryped with no passwords.
And there's approximately one CCTV camera for every 14 people in this country, despite the fact that they help in approximately 3% of all crimes.
Jason
See http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/ for diving trip reports and the UK Underwater Visibility Database.
See http://www.scuba-addict.co.uk/trips2010.html for details about my 2010 dive trips to Plymouth, Weymouth and Eastbourne.
I wish I could write like this
Between the Hammer and the Anvil: From There To Here - A Guide To Self-Loathing In Three Easy Steps
Ian
“Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it”
- Samuel Johnson
I find it surreal that we are now expected to take lessons in Civil Liberty from a man who:
- voted FOR Section 28
- voted FOR 28 days
- voted FOR the death penalty
- voted FOR a reduction in the upper limit for abortion
- voted FOR ID cards (only once though 20.12.2004) Link
- supports the scrapping of Human Rights legislation
Fine principle David, shame that otherwise you're such a neanderthal though.
Ian
“Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it”
- Samuel Johnson
If not politicians, should we put our trust in the police?
Yesterday, on emerging from the bowels of the Picadilly line as is my wont at half six on a Thursday, I was dismayed to see a wall of armoured police surrounding a pair of electronic weapons-detecting barriers through which the good residents of Wood Green were being made to walk.
So I took it upon myself to engage a couple of members of Her Majesty’s Constabulary in conversation.
‘Why are the scanners up again?’
‘It’s a deterrent. You know, knife crime. You watch the news, don’t you?’
‘So what are they for?’
‘Well, to see if anyone’s carrying a knife.’
‘Is it against the law to refuse to go through, then? Say, what would happen if I just walked right round the edge?’
‘Well, you’re not exactly carrying a knife, are you?!’ Sner sner, oi lads look at the sweet little white girl in her cardie trying to be clever.
I tried a different tack. ‘So, how do these barriers tell if you’re carrying a knife rather than just, say, any old metal?’
‘They don’t. They’re quite neanderthal really. They just flash red when someone’s got metal.’
‘But hang on. The lights are flashing red for every other person. Why aren’t you stopping all those people?’
‘Well…’ indulgent little police-officer smile turns into get-rid-of-this-member-of-the-public grin ‘look, we just use our judgement - say, if someone like your good self set off the buzzers, well,’ looks me up and down ‘you’re clearly not the sort of person to be carrying a knife, are you?’
‘So what sort of people would you stop and search, then?’
‘Well, you watch the news.’
‘Of course I watch the news. What sort of people would you stop?’
‘You know, the sort of people who commit crimes. You watch the news.’
‘You haven’t answered my question.’
‘Are you a journalist?’
‘Absolutely.’
‘My colleagues and I aren’t trained for this. Bugger off and call the press office and go through those barriers while you’re about it.’
Stunned, I marched through the ancient plastic barriers, the metal buckles on my boots winking.
And the lights flashed red.
And nobody stopped me.
Link
Ian
“Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant than would take even a little trouble to acquire it”
- Samuel Johnson