| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the YD Scuba forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
| Surface Interval: Discuss Using Tour operators in the General Diving Forums forums: <font color='#0000FF'>I'm wondering about the pros & cons of tour operators. Normally I'm very relunctant to use one and in ... |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Imported post Hi Chris, I've organised many private trips and several group trips and have always booked direct except on my last trip to the Red Sea, which I booked with Red Sea divers. The only advantage of booking through a tour operator, as far as I can see, is that it saves you some work (not much). The big adavantage of booking direct is that you have total control. YOU decide which liveaboard you want to go on or which hotel you stay at and which divecentre you use. You're not limited to the boats/hotels/divecentres the tour operator gets the best commission from. Others may have found other advantages of booking through a tour operator, though.
__________________ "From birth, man carries the weight of gravity on his shoulders. He is bolted to earth. But man has only to sink beneath the surface and he is free." - Jacques Cousteau |
| ||||
| Imported post <font color='#810541'>weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelllllllllllll I have to first admit to a personal interest in this subject as I work for a "large household name tour operator" in the UK. Not a diving operator but a general holiday / tours operator. In the UK there is a distinct advantage to booking a holiday with a package operator; package holidays are covered by the ATOL bond in case the company goes bust. If you book independent elements - even if all booked through the same agent - you will not be covered. See details from the CAA: ATOL bonding There are other reasons why a package holiday wins out over independent travelling - in popular resorts the best hotels are committed years in advance to the big few holiday companies. One company that operates in Europe has a stated policy of 'owning the beach' - by owning or contracting hotels in advance, they will make you book with them if you want a beach front hotel in a number of major resorts. Of course that depends on your definition of 'best'; the package holiday operators cater for a particular sector of the market and if you like anything that does not generally fit with the core market you will possibly save money by going independent. Before doing that, though, check with the big few operators as they are doing more specialist / niche packages as mainstream product now (e.g. Villas, Cruising). Of course this does not answer the specific question on specialist diving operators - but the ATOL bonding DOES apply (so if you take John G's example of a liveaboard, if you book independently for flights and boat you have no ATOL protection if for example the boat sinks or if a flight delay means you miss the sailing, hence you have to claim on YOUR insurance as opposed to getting compensation from the operator). These are only a couple of reasons and my personal view is that if you are going to a mainstream resort, save your cash and time by booking a package - if you want anything special (and that could be as simple as an odd duration, or flying back to a different airport from the departure airport) then go independent. If I didn't get discounts on packages I would do the latter. Andy
__________________ The first rule of diving: Anyone can call the dive for any reason. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||