| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the YD Scuba forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
| Tek-Talk: Discuss kinetic / graham in the Technical and Specialist Diving Forums forums: Din valves of course BUT... twin 10 0r 12s....steel at 10s I have found a waight of 24 kg...thats Faber.. ... |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| Din valves of course BUT... twin 10 0r 12s....steel at 10s I have found a waight of 24 kg...thats Faber.. any advice welcome. G
__________________ May the current and flow be with you.. |
| ||||
| Imported post <font color='#000080'>Hi Kinetic, I dived for a few years with 10's and found that the 2nd dive wasn't as long as I would like so I switched to 12's and wish I had done it ages ago. Also the weight difference is hardly noticable IMO. HTH. Safe diving, Steve.
__________________ ''Wow, l actually agree with the bearded blind crippled chicken shagger for once'' Diving Dud - 20/3/08 As everyone else is claiming a relationship to him, I hereby admit to being the Dud's younger, slimmer and better looking Northern Brother who was exiled at an early age due to embarrassing handsomeness. DUE member and GUSAC Founder member |
| ||||
| Imported post <font color='#000080'>OK, I use 300var 7's, but I've found 232 10s fine for mid-rnage stuff. If you want to go a bit further, you're going to find 12s are almost standard issue for deep stuff. You may have problems with 300 bar trimix, and here and there with nitrox, so the 232 option seems sensible. That said, a set of 300 10s are nice and heavy, so less weight on the belt. Then again, by the time your diving is into that sort of territory, your weightbelt's as good as gone anyway. |
| |||
| Imported post <font color='#0000FF'>I've got twin 10s, they were a reasonable buy S/H which was the "carrot" , they're small enough that I use them for all situations, even training in 6m, I'm not sure If I would do this with twin 12s, bearing in mind this would tend to be shore diving. I guess this is dependent on body size and fitness. But if you plan to do lots of deep stuff I'd say you'd be better off with 12's Chee-az Steve |
| ||||
| Imported post <font color='#000F22'>I consider 30 mins the minimum dive time on a wreck. I am not talking about total time on the dive, I meen time on the wreck. Did a 70min dive with Andrew on Friday and we got 30 mins exactly on the wreck. We wanted more but dispite doing a gas switch to deco at 21m we still only came up with 90 bar apeice. Not a big reserve at 45-50m. We wanted a 40 min bottom time but found that twin 12s would limit us to 35mins with a reasnoble redunduncy in the gas. Our SAC on the 50m dive was apx 15 lpm So twin 12's limit our dive on a 10@50m 20@45m dive Twin 10s are not an option in this range Twin 10s are not a two dive option in the 30m range Twin 10s are a good option for two sub 20m dive or one 40m dive To me thats too limiting in the dive profile ATB Mark Chase
__________________ Mark, dispite the fact your a Heron shagging tosser I agree with you , Steve S 10/04/08 ATB as most people will tell you, means Always Talking Boll@cks. My responses to threads should be treated accordingly All The Best Mark Chase Screw the force Luke, use the VR3 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||