| | |||||||
|
Welcome to the YD Scuba forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
| Tek-Talk: Discuss 30m - deep? in the Technical and Specialist Diving Forums forums: I consider a dive to be deep when I am no longer in my comfort zone and therefore it will ... |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Using words like 'deep' for it's emotive effect isn't really helpful. Each dive needs its own assessment, I hate the jargon phrase 'risk assessment' as it implies too many bits of paper but that's the sort of idea. I tend to plug in the kit for the dive based on my assesment of how long I'm going to be there, how long I'm going to take to get back and what might break during that time. 10 meters could be suicide on my oxygen rebreather, 60 meters on nitrox but just 1 meter on 10/60 trimix. Too fast an ascent with a deco loading could be very bad or too slow an ascent when freediving. |
| ||||
| I've always seen depth is pretty irrelevant once you have factored for gas. Time to the surface is what makes a dive serious to me - whether that is deco or exit time. Is 3000 feet back in a 6 metre cave deep or shallow? Well when you have a 60 minute swim to air it's a serious dive to me. A very, very experienced technical instructor died in Ginnie Springs a couple of weeks ago. The entire system is 30 metres or less. He had drained both his on board RB tanks, both his bailout tanks and his body was found only a few feet from one of his full stages. In an environment where most of us can do not much more than a minute without gas, anything more than that is too far if we have none.
__________________ Interested in DIR dive training/courses? - always happy to chat/answer questions via PM or email |
| ||||
| For me "deep" is when bottom time is so short it's not worth going there, I'm not (yet) deco qualified so whilst I would not have any problem diving to 40m and have in the past, I don't see the point if I can't stay a while to enjoy it. I love diving but don't want to spend the majority of the dive mid water, particularly in the UK, it could be slightly different if I was diving the Brothers and dropped to 40 then came up the wall slowly as we drifted. My 2p
__________________ Give a hungry man a fish and he will eat for a day Teach a hungry man to fish and he will buy a bad hat Talk to a hungry man about fishing and you are a consultant. Safe diving Pete |
| ||||
| Quote:
Yes, but logically that diver was 3000ft deep. Cave diving is on a par with deco diving as a base line. 15mins deco = 15mins into the cave However you can blow off 15mins of deco you cant blow of 15mins into a cave. So we have to look at a OW dive which if blown off will likely kill you. Maybe 90mins of deco? (total guess) So a 15min entry into a cave is a bit like a deco dive with 90mins deco in terms of risk of death. Mexico 14m deep 60mins into the cave is a bloody big dive for me and I am a LOT more nervous about doing it than I am about doing a 60m two hour dive dive in OW in the UK. ATB Mark
__________________ Mark, dispite the fact your a Heron shagging tosser I agree with you , Steve S 10/04/08 ATB as most people will tell you, means Always Talking Boll@cks. My responses to threads should be treated accordingly All The Best Mark Chase Screw the force Luke, use the VR3 |
| ||||
| Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
(And I know about the journey to the site etc.) I'm not risk averse. I seek it, as I expect many here do. I just thought a reminder of the inate hostility our chosen environment was prudent. Diving is potentially dangerous. We shouldn't forget it. |
| ||||
| Quote:
I dont think depth is the issue at all, if the dive is planned for and the gas is apprpriate with enough bailout or redundancy. In some ways i feel that a 40m dive taken seriously is much safer than a 15m bimble done casually. I see loads of these types of dives - no redundancy (buddy / team or otherwise) and no thought to time planing. You can do a bouyant ascent much easier from 15m but i dont think that makes it safer. i'd rather plan not to run out of gas, or as in Si's post yesterday have a team nearby to donate gas in case of equipement failure.
__________________ Liam "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." Sir George of Best |
| ||||
| As the person in that thread which mentioned 30m, to me it boils down to comfort zones, as has been alluded to already. 30m with 2 attentive buddies, lots of gas (2 twins of 32 and 4 stages of 50%) and a straight line to the surface didn't worry me; 15m solo would make me more concerned. Good starting post Mark and it has promoted some debate, which is always good.
__________________ Gareth Images of Life Photography DIR Team Foxturd Blog: Travels Underwater and Further Afar Son, you're going to have to make up your mind about growing up and becoming aircrew. You can't do both. The aircraft limits are only there in case there is another flight by that particular aircraft. If subsequent flights do not appear likely, there are no limits. Last edited by GLOC : 02-04-08 at 11:49 AM. Reason: Hate you Wilbo!! |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Wilbo. |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Cheers, Graham Steve Zissou: "Sorry about that. You caught me with one foot off the merry-go-round tonight." |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||