f31 or f50

[colinicky]

I can't comment about underwater photos yet but have used my F50 for the last 2 weeks on Holiday in Austria on most modes ( landscape ,snow ,Night,museum,text Normal & full auto ) & absolutely love it .
Some of the night time shots are amazingly clear ,actually looks clearer than looking at it with the naked eye , photo's of fireworks are good as well .
From previous threads I don't think that most of us would notice any difference between the quality on the f30 or the f50 .
Just a thing that I was doing while away :- if you are in a museum & taking pictures ,take a picture of the item then change to "text" mode & take a pic of the text beside the item .Then in years to come you can look at the picture & text shot & know what it was !

[Ahoy]

I don't think the F50s are setup for RAW format: that's the reason I wouldn't get one.

S.

[markbsac]

see my red sea pics with my fd31...im very happy the pics are raw and untouched...im sure i will get better with the camera but for a photo idiot like me i think the results are better than i ever expected....good luck anyway

markbsac - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

[ChristianG]

Originally Posted by Rocko Diver

Other people have also asked this question, search for ChristianG, he has some comment on the matter or search forums for F31 & F50..[/url]

You rang?

Where was I? Oh yes, here:

Pixels

[ChristianG]

Originally Posted by BJ

F50fd has 6400 Iso at lower pixel ratings.

Ah, but jb, you know and I know that that means nowt other than significant noise.

[ponybottle]

fd31 has better low light performace over fd50 making it my choice considering Irish water conditions ( i.e sometimes I feel I should forget the torch and dive with a white stick instead ! )

Chris