Apoc -a- Lapse
....
1. Given the obvious problems it is throwing up - I am particularly interested to understand the reason for the apparent mis - alignment of :
a. the integrated O2 cylinder / cylinder valve bore / cylinder valve knob shaft axis with the
b. centre point of the apparent access hole in the casing
2. This is because it seems absurd that it does not appear to have been coordinated in the design to align properly and there also appear to be issues with the conflicting adjacency of the external side mounted cylinder valve knob and regulator
3. This is an issue that also appears to be borne out in the DL technical drawings, where one might make the reasonable assumption that, in the first place, the design appears to have forgotten to allow the control of the integrated O2 cylinder valve through the case during the dive :
a. In drawing ORM0100A1.dwg dated 16/11/2009 - item 791e Tank Valve for O2 service 230 bar M25 inlet M26 outlet) the cylinder valve control knob is shown as :
i. internal to the case and
ii. clearly protruding at a 90 degree angle from the axis of the cylinder valve, rotated and pointing c45 degrees from the horizontal towards the inside of the rear cover
b. On that same drawing (as with the other drawings) it does appear strange that the person drafting the drawing appears to have chosen to obscure the exploded view of the hole alignment and not shown the elevational view which would have clarified this cylinder valve knob access as a key part of the assembly
c. In drawing ORS7000A.dwg dated 18/05/2009 the (wearers right hand side) side elevation appears to clearly define the circumference arc of the internal O2 cylinder fixing strap and one can by simple scaling of the drawing identify that there is not alignment with:
i. the integrated O2 cylinder / cylinder valve bore / cylinder valve knob shaft axis with the
ii. centre point of the apparent access hole in the casing
4. Under normal analysis and review of the design one would question whether the whole point of this essential access to the integrated O2 cylinder valve external to the case during the dive was ever properly considered.
5. To many this may seem like pedantics, but it does raise the questions as to whether:
a. such an important part of the strategic design (the iCCR integrated O2 VIPR) was not ever properly and adequately defined
b. this is at the core of the problem being currently experienced by EAs of servicable "fit" irrespective of the use of VIPR or user procured non VIPR orientated integrated O2 cylinder / cylinder valve bore / cylinder valve knob valve assemblies.
c. if 5.b. is correct, the servicable "fit" of two adjacent assemblies namely the integrated O2 cylinder valve knob and any externally mounted cylinder knob and regulator assembly could be in such conflict as to make the "fit" practically unservicable.
d. why OSEL now publish a 3D rendered CAD image on their Facebook page for no apparent reason or context in Q3 2011, describing the VIPR as a "concept" (and ironically once again it does appear very strange that the person drafting the 3D rendered CAD image drawing appears to have chosen to obscure the very "concept" the drawing is meant to define).
e. Why none of the photographic images hard won from OSEL actually show the serviceable "fit" of the two adjacent assemblies namely the integrated O2 cylinder valve knob and any externally mounted cylinder knob and regulator assembly
6. I am therefore very keen to see how although being part of a much boasted 200 man year design development, one must now wait to see how 3 end users on three different continents are going to be forced execute a homebuild work around to make this rebreather operate safely - Good Luck to Moley, Harley and Monty - sometimes the ingenuity of the enthusiastic end user far exceeds that of the full resources of the designer and manufacturer - Not so much "Open Safety Equipment Limited" as " Partially Open Safety Equipment Limited"
Ding Ding